At a California high school track meet, a controversial moment has reignited the national debate over transgender athletes in women’s sports. During the CIF Southern Section Finals, Reese Hogan from Crean Lutheran High School finished second in the triple jump but took a stand by stepping onto the empty first-place podium spot after the winner, transgender athlete AB Hernandez, left.
Hernandez, who was born male but now competes as female, won the event by more than four feet. This incident has intensified the ongoing discussion about fairness and inclusion in women’s sports.
Supporters of transgender athletes emphasize identity and equal rights, while critics argue that allowing transgender women to compete threatens the integrity of female competitions. bIn response to these debates, former President Donald Trump signed an executive order banning transgender women from female sports divisions, calling it an end to the “war on women’s sports.”
The reaction online was swift and divided. Many criticized Hernandez’s participation, questioning fairness, while others defended her, stating she competed within the rules. Some critics have suggested that transgender athletes should compete in separate leagues to maintain fairness.
Hernandez responded to the backlash by calling it “ridiculous” and stressed that she has followed all rules. Studies on the athletic performance of transgender women compared to cisgender women show mixed results, with no clear evidence of consistent advantage.
The debate is far from settled, with more states proposing bans and athletes on both sides speaking out. Reese Hogan’s silent protest on the podium has added fuel to this ongoing and complex discussion about the future of women’s sports.
